 |
After a long, long wait, some
talk is finally emerging from TfL and the Mayor
concerning the Heritage Routes. There are going
to be two... and that's all we're being told at
the moment. Not where they're going to go, or
what they will be numbered, or who's going to
operate them and from where, and most important,
what with. It's being dressed up as some sort of
stay of execution, but I'm not that easily
fooled, because in order to meet the requirements
for the Routemasters to be to Euro 2
specification, they're going to have to come from
one of the final three routes, whose OPO
conversion dates have not been announced. Indeed, the largest
concentration of such buses is that currently run
by Sovereign on the 13 - which still has no date
published to lose its Routemasters, although
London United's large order for 58 Scania
Omnidekkas will unfortunately include enough for
the 13. With a delivery window stretching between
August and November, it's just a question of
whether the 13 will beat the 159 and 38 to be the
last 'real' route. If the Heritage Route(s) are
set to start in October, that could end up being
one hell of a month.
Instead of
spending yet more tax-extorted money on tourist
trifles, I suppose it's beyond them just to
simply cancel the conversion of just one route -
i.e. the 38, which fulfils all the functions
you'd want of a tourist service (sightseeing) as
well as the more important, if mundane role of
conveying large numbers of people from workplace
to railheads, shops and home. To that end, the
responsibility is on TfL to make sure these
services are as close to normal as possible. We
don't want Disney routes with Dick van Dyke on
the platform, thank you. In a crucially important
move that has relieved sceptics (like me), early
plans to impose a surcharge on farepayers and
Travelcard holders would appear to have been
shelved.
I was sketching
out what I'd recommend for these routes (using
the only two low numbers currently vacant) and
came up with the following patterns; let's see
what the real things look like in a few months'
time.
Route 129 - PUTNEY BRIDGE
STATION via 14 to Hyde Park Corner, 19 to
Tottenham Court Road, 73 to Angel and 19 to
HIGHBURY & ISLINGTON. (serves the
riverside, the museums, Harrods, Harvey Nichols,
Hyde Park, Piccadilly and the ends of Oxford
Street (while not serving Oxford Street itself,
as per mandate), then taking rush-hour passengers
to Euston and Kings Cross St Pancras, and after
that through Islington to a convenient terminus
that's not too bedevilled by traffic or too far
into ropey areas).
Route 135 - NOTTING HILL GATE
via 52 to High Street Kensington, 9 to Aldwych
and RV1 to Tower Gateway and ALDGATE.
(serves Kensington, the museums, Harrods, Harvey
Nichols, Hyde Park, Piccadilly, Trafalgar Square
and theatreland, caters for Charing Cross,
Waterloo and London Bridge commuters and then
takes in the London Eye (if it's still around!),
the Tate Modern, Tower Bridge, the Tower of
London and the Gherkin).
I'd give the former to London General at Putney
and the latter to Stagecoach East London at Bow -
both garages are professional and capable. I have
no idea who's tendered for the routes in reality,
so any bias (as if!) is my own. The buses would
receive 1933 London Transport livery and retain
their fleetnumbers (in gold leaf, naturally),
with all hopper windows replaced by proper
wind-down versions that actually let air
circulate. I'd even spring for wheelchair lifts
to be installed in the centre of the buses - it's
been done before, after all, by London Coaches.
For now,
Trafalgar Square is the location of this picture,
where we see RM 346 (SVS 615, ex WLT 346)
on the 159 and RM 441 (LDS 341A, ex WLT 441)
on the 13 - both to Euro 2 emissions spec with
Cummins B series engines and Allison T270
gearboxes. As London's centre, Trafalgar Square must
have a Routemaster service. My proposal would
serve there - will Ken's?
|